Equipoise – Boldenone UndecylenateBoldenone undecylenate dosage and frequency for bodybuilders and athletes is often a equipoise dosage frequency of personal preference depending on ultimate goals. It carries a lot of the same properties as this male hormone, and holds the precise anabolic strength rating of Testosterone. EQ has also been found to be vulnerable to equipoise dosage frequency, which refers to its proclivity to convert into the estrogen hormone through contact with the aromatase enzyme. In a majority of cases, the medically recommended dosage of a synthetic anabolic androgenic lumbar epidural steroid injection is quite a bit less than that taken by the average bodybuilder. What can happen if dosages climb to high?
Equipoise - Boldenone Undecylenate | Anabolic Bible
Boldenone, particularly Boldenone Undecyclenate, is a drug which has procured devoted advocates on both sides of the fence. Opinions run strong regarding the effectiveness of this steroid, with the unimpressed often chastising it as worthless and its ardent supporters touting it as indispensible.
Perhaps more than any other steroid, there is a clear rift between acceptance and rejection and while variances in personal response combined with its slow-acting nature no doubt play a role in this divide, I am convinced that the primary reason for such conflicting views is due to suboptimal dosing practices among many of its users.
Boldenone, most commonly known as Equipoise EQ for short , and also sold under the names Ganabol, Equigan and Ultragan, was originally produced as a veterinary steroid. Legend has it that even 8X Mr. Olympia himself, Lee Haney, was a big fan of this drug. Here are some basic facts: It is a non-progestagenic, non-methylated 1-dehydro derivative of testosterone, so it lacks the liver toxic effects associated with most oral steroids.
It possesses an A: A ratio of Boldenone displays a weaker binding affinity for the androgen receptor than testosterone, yet it is less prone to attach to sex hormone binding globulin, which likely helps to balance out its myotropic effects.
The drug will maintain blood levels of the base compound for roughly days post-injection, yet twice weekly injections are appropriate when attempting to maintain stable blood levels. One interesting characteristic of Boldenone which bears mentioning is the discrepancy between its proposed rate of aromatization and its propensity to initiate estrogen side effects. However, real-world experience has shown us that EQ is very unlikely to propagate serious estrogenic side effects, even when administered at high dosages.
For example, it is very common for a testosterone user to experience gynecomastia and water retention at a dosage of mg per week, if not dealt with…and they almost always occur when venturing up to the , mg per week range. Many users will encounter these side effects even when using as little as mg per week.
However, when administering EQ at dosages of mg per week, those side effects rarely manifest…and few users experience them even when using 1, mg per week or more! With EQ aromatizing at half the rate of testosterone, one would expect to witness estrogenic side effects in a large percentage of users, but this does not occur. Specifically, Boldenone metabolizes to an anti-aromatase inhibitor known as 1,4 dienedone.
This could certainly explain why Boldenone, despite it relatively high rate of aromatization, does not deliver anywhere near the estrogenic punch that its aromatization rate implies. One highly prized trait of EQ, which has been established as a long-held belief for decades now, is its ability to increase vascularity to a greater degree than other androgens. It is true that all androgens increase RBC count, which can potentially increase vascularity, yet science has not yet found any mechanism by which Boldenone might accomplish this more proficiently than other AAS.
Still, I do not find this surprising given the fact that we know many things about AAS through real-world experience, which have not yet been proven by accepted science. Personally, I am not yet convinced of its existence, as there are not only other plausible explanations, but I have never experienced it myself, despite experimenting with large dosages of the drug.
Still, I do not deny the possibility of its existence, being that many individuals over the years have supported the notion. As expected, Boldenone is known to provide lean, hard, water-free increases in muscle tissue. Because of this, I began to re-evaluate the proposed optimal dosing guidelines for this drug and what I found that is that unlike most other steroids, which usually begin to reach the point of diminishing returns at between , mg per week, EQ tends to reach its optimal dosing range much later on…around 2 grams per week great results will be found between 1.
Of course, all steroids will continue to activate more receptor sites and thus provide greater muscle growth , up until about 3, mg per week, but with Boldenone, it seems that the gains are just starting to get good at 1 gram weekly, while most other AAS seem to be nearly tapped out by that point, quickly hitting the point of diminishing returns.
One factor which makes higher dosing with EQ possible is its relatively mild nature, in terms of side effects. While many steroids would be rather unpleasant to run at 2 grams weekly, many individuals will find Boldenone to be rather tame at that dose.
This is an important consideration because after all, no one wants to be miserable on-cycle. Assumably, this mentality was instilled through the repeated dosing recommendations of other AAS, which by their nature, do not need to be dosed much higher than 1 gram weekly in order to achieve near optimal results, but with Boldenone, we are dealing with a different animal altogether.
When dosed at the above mentioned range, Boldenone becomes a formidable muscle-builder, packing on genuine muscle fiber rather quickly. No, using bold at 2 grams weekly will not add as much bodyweight as 2 grams of test, but unlike testosterone, the weight gained will be actual muscle tissue, not a moderate amount of muscle accompanied by a small pool of water.
In short, you will look much better using 2 grams of Boldenone along with a moderate amount of test, than you will be using a mountain of test along with a moderate dose of Bold. If you do, I can promise you impressive, high-quality, water-free increases in muscle tissue, along with dramatic increases in vascularity over a week period. Newer Post Aerobic vs Weight Training: Which is Better For Fat Loss. Older Post The easiest slimming tip.
Sign Up For Our Newsletter: