Knights' Mullen tests positive to steroidsJarrod Anabolic steroids in rugby league NRL career hangs in the balance after the Newcastle star was provisionally suspended by the NRL for testing positive to an anabolic steroid. The Knights and NRL announced on Tuesday afternoon that Mullen had returned a positive sample to Drostanolone in an out-of-season test in late November. The test came just a week after the year-old aggravated a recurring right hamstring testosterone sale. We need to respect the process and in the interim the anabolic steroids in rugby league will continue to monitor Jarrod's welfare. A shocked Gidley later told reporters that there anaoblic any more education the game could provide to its players regarding the consequences of drug use. For a player that I've known for 20 years. He's an experienced player.
English rugby league player receives four-year ban for steroid use
Anabolic steroid usage by professional rugby players, including the All Blacks self. Having been interested in the topic of AAS recently, it has kind of given me a bit of realisation as to the nature of professional sport. It got me thinking, are the All Blacks doing the same? If you look into it a bit, it appears all professional sportspeople are doping, and it's almost impossible to test for it.
There's a great write up on it here:. Testosterone would be one of the drugs of choice, and it's almost impossible to test for because the range considered abuse is so high.
According to this article , athletes could be on mg of testosterone a week and pass a drug test. By way of example mg a week is what a bodybuilder would take on a "cycle". There's also the possibility of "cycling" during the off season whilst no testing to put on strength.
Remember the All Blacks training camp pre RWC where some players were putting on 10 -- 15 kg of mass in three months. Then there's the actual size of the players. These guys are mutants, especially if you compare them to younger selves. Don't get me wrong, these guys have the best genetics out there, and regardless of whether these guys supplement, they still put in the hard yards.
I'd just like to hear if anyone else has similar thoughts on the subject. I can assure you that this is completely false. It's actually relatively easy to detect testosterone doping. Anti-doping tests do not measure the absolute levels of testosterone in the system. They measure the ratio of the metabolites that are expressed in urine.
Exogenous testosterone leaves a distinct signature that can be detected analytically. They measure the testosterone: If you have been taking testosterone it will be completely out of whack. The average is 1: The problem with this is that you can use in the off season to bulk up then you can cycle off and if it's done properly no one will be any wiser.
I was under the impression that WADA doesn't actually do the testing but creates the banned list and accredits labs to perform the testing. Here are the NZRU's anti doping regulations http: They use Drug Free Sport's regulations to govern testing http: Testing is set out in 6. Doesn't give a frequency but this article states that over 6, samples have been taken from players by the IRB this year, with 1. Aftermatch piss tests are not sufficient. If they were serious they'd be doing random blood tests in and out of competition.
Anything else is just for show. It's probably more likely that they simply don't get tested very often. It's somewhat of an open secret at this point. It's a strange situation for sure. I know that Olympic eligible athletes get pee tested reasonably often, like a couple of times a year, but if you know that you are only getting urine done it's pretty easy to mask or pick specific drugs to make stuff hard to detect.
That's to say nothing of peptide abuse. It's extremely difficult to keep the ratios constant. They fluctuate as the medication takes effect and wears off.
Not to mention the problems with testes shutting down production of endogenous testosterone - which can only be restarted with drugs like Clomid which is itself a banned and detectable substance. It takes a lot to shut down your testes completely. You can restart after a cycle without clomid, provided a short cycle is used with low doses.
A bodybuilder may run a cycle for weeks, or even a year, he'd be a fool to not use clomid or any other pct. A sportsman would run a short cycle weeks, typically test with propionate ester attached, or none at all, coupled with an oral or two. They would barely shut down, and be clear within weeks. There are documented cases of athletes reaching the point where Clomid and other therapeutic interventions have no effect on restoring natural function. The longest test e or test p will stay in your system injected and be measurable is 2 weeks.
Usually, it will be gone in 3 - 4 days depending of course on how much you take. But more importantly, test is naturally occurring, and doping tests can be cheated by changing the ratios. Test is measured against its ratio to epitestosterone as you say. Most men have a ratio of 1: The World Anti-Doping Agency allows up to 4: You can take drugs to increase your epitestosterone and bring the ratio down. But you could also, i dunno, increase your test level to 4x the average man and still be within the range.
Tests compare blood values of an individual against the population, the levels can get stupidly high before a fail. Blood is almost never drawn for sports testing purposes. The primary analytical pathway is urinalysis. I hope they're doing it under medical supervision to reduce the chances of negative side effects but I hope they're doing it.
There's a saying in American sports "If you ain't cheatin, you ain't tryin. I think it also suggests that if you're not aggressively pushing the limits you're behind the curve and that will cost you. I think anti-doping policies are a complete joke. We've drawn an almost totally arbitrary line that says "some scientific and medical advances are OK and some aren't".
I'd rather we say "yep, science is great, go ahead and use it to improve athletic performance and therefore medical care in the future - there's a trickle down effect from athletics to normal healthcare much like from F1 to street cars ". I've never heard of a rugby union player ever being popped which simply means there is no sufficient testing.
My father who was a professional wrestler pointed out to me that guys with the messed up voice is a definite sign of steroid abuse. I started to notice a buttload of professional wrestlers from the past like Hulk Hogan, Randy Savage etc all speak with the same raspy voice and they were all heavy steroid abusers.
Many league players seem to have the same voice issues but not as many union players. Macho Man Randy Savage - Cream of the crop. Also in , during a game for the Broncos, Lockyer took a hit to the throat which caused damage to a small bone in his larynx. This has resulted in his unusually husky-sounding voice, which could be corrected with surgery that Lockyer has so far declined to undergo.
Rugby has a rather comprehensive testing regime both during the season and off season and players get popped all the time. Mostly younger guys and girls in lower leagues, but there have been some cases of high profile players.
I would say that rugby is probably one of the cleanest sports. If abuse was systemic ie. Do you have a link to the testing regime? I've never heard of any players getting caught which just means they aren't testing sufficiently because any professional sport is going to have cheats at the highest level. Yeah, can't really think of the reason why given its detrimental to performance if anything, but WADA says its banned so it it.
You should see the list of players banned for cannabis when they drug test at Touch tournaments, its carnage. In the first instance, there is a strong moral component to anti-drugs-in-sport campaigning. There is opposition to recreational drug use except alcohol, of course among sports administrations globally, which is in keeping with their generally conservative bent.
So there's a natural tendency to clamp down on drug-use generally. There's a political reason as well. WADA has become really powerful and influential, and part of the reason is that it works well with the US government. Part of the success of this is aligning WADA with the war on drugs, both in terms of the rhetoric that is used, and the policies and practices they use.
It's unsurprising he reinforced this message. By the way--have you heard of Dock Ellis, who reputedly ]pitched a no-hitter while tripping on acid] https: Okay, the whereabouts aren't necessarily given to WADA who don't actually perform tests and it's not for all players. There isn't any information on how many players get selected or how they select who is to be part of the program.
I don't have an 'IRB passport' so I can't view your second link. Your first link is just about the RWC. The details around Goosen's suspension are sketchy, that link doesn't even name the stimulant.
Not only where Basson and Ralepelle cleared of charges but the stimulant they were popped for was being used by the entire team and had been for quite some time Sailor and Stevens failed for Cocaine detected from a post-match urine sample. The most useless form of testing you could possibly do. It's more of an IQ test than anything else. Looks like it is mostly for show until they start doing random blood tests with bio passports for all top level players the cheating will simply be rampant.
Try harder, you can do it. Don't shift the goal posts around, don't claw around for some semantic bullshit to dig yourself out with, you were talking out your arse making claims based on nothing, just admit it. Because all you're doing is spewing their PR nonsense. There's no comprehensive random blood testing, every done is just enough for them to say they are doing it meanwhile the process is trivial to circumvent and the cheating is rampant.